I didn't vote for Stephanie Rawling-Blake during the primary. It's not the I don't like her -- I think she's alright, and actually think she's done some good things. In fact, I have a bit of a crush. I appreciated her arrival on the scene in the middle of the blizzard of 2009, as I think she did a great job managing resources during that time. And I don't have any big issues with how she is running the city. In fact, one of my favorite former students campaigned for her and I had a sign in my yard until someone stole it.
However, sometime in August, I attended a meet-and-greet with her at a private residence in west Baltimore. It was myself and around 12 others, having a conversation with the mayor. I had a great time and Ms. Rawlings-Blake was both effervescent and kind, while also being business-like and professional. I was asked there along with another teacher so we might bring some education discussion to the table. Indeed, we did, and that was the moment that turned me a bit.
When we asked Rawlings-Blake about education issues, and she mentioned two things her administration has done: that she has quadrupled (could have been tripled) funding for Teach for America, and that she has championed another program that brought senior citizens into the classroom. I'd never heard of the latter, so I dismissed it, and my feelings on the former are decidedly mixed. Ultimately, Rawlings-Blake's insufficient answer made her seem out of touch with the schools, and made me realize that I didn't want to excitedly vote for a candidate that seemed to have this sort of distance from her school system.
Now, I mentioned earlier that my feelings on Teach for America are decidedly mixed, because they are, and that's ultimately what this post is about. Now, I think the program itself is great in many ways. But the way it works in Baltimore City Public Schools makes hiring anyone else impossible.
You see, the way things are set up, because BCPSS has some sort of exclusive contract with TFA, that schools are not allowed to hire any new teachers except if they are (a) TFA or (b) castoffs from another school. A teacher like me, who wanted to be a teacher since I was a freshmen in college, and worked hard in my Education courses and made into a competitive College of Education at my university, and then received my certification before I got my first job, would be
ineligible to be hired by schools. Is this not crazy? We can only hire young teachers straight out of college who
weren't trained to be educators in college.
In addition, if a great 6-year veteran from another district moved to the area, she would also be ineligible to be hired. She might as well put her application into the county because, unless a principal can convince the higher-ups to get around the rules and the talent pool, she won't be getting a job in the schools that might need her the most.
Part of this is budgetary and because jobs aren't available for all, and because teachers who have been excessed from other schools have to go
somewhere. But the exclusivity deal with TFA (which, apparently, even charter schools are held to -- Dr. Alonso told principals who balked to "take me to court") really ties the hands of schools.
This is not an anti-TFA post. We've hired one per year in our department the last two years and they're both doing great. But a hiring system that doesn't allow the hiring of teacher with teaching certification and education degrees can't be getting the best and brightest in the system. We need a wide net.
And that's the story of why I voted for Jody Landers. That, and he cleaned up on the debates and I knew Rawlings-Blake was going to walk away with it anyway.
By the way, I'm supporting the other Baltimore Education bloggers who are also blogging every day this month. Check out their blogs!:
http://survivingthesystem.blogspot.com/
http://bmoreschools.org/
http://www.thesmallesttwine.blogspot.com/
http://nyates314.wordpress.com/