Pondering discussions

In discussions, Class A follows the rules closely. They offer a comment, provide a quotation that supports it, and mention any literary devices that are present that help contribute to meaning. This gives the the total possible three points. I call on six people at once because there are so many hands raised ("We'll go from John to Michelle to Aneeka to...") and everyone doesn't get to talk. It is technically strong and ensures a wide use of literary terms.

It's also incredibly boring and not much of a conversation.

This is a competitive class with a lot of kids who really care about their grades. It does not translate to good discussions.

Class B, though, is a little bit less like this. Class B speaks more freely, digging at the topic and turning it around in their heads. They talk to each other more. I talk to them more. They sprinkle in the literary terms, but don't seem like they're wedging them in there for a grade. It's so much nicer as well as more insightful.

I did the discussion a little bit differently for Class B, after Class A's was a little like pulling teeth. I structured it more. I went down the planning sheet. Should have done that with the first class, I guess.

I'm wondering if it's more me than them, or a combination of the two. Class B felt great afterwards. Class A felt a little like there wasn't that much learning going on, just talking to get a grade.

Hmmm...