Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Rethinking curriculum, midyear

For the last several years, the 9th grade curriculum has been all centered around the theme of Coming of Age in an Unjust Society. The texts we cover during the school year were as follows: Fences, A Lesson Before Dying, To Kill a Mockingbird, Romeo and Juliet, Persepolis

For the last few years, we have had an increasing number of students read To Kill a Mockingbird in their middle school English classes, sort of forcing our hand to change. Our curriculum also, probably, was too black/white, and jettisoning TKAM (which is about my favorite book and one I love to teach) was a way for our curriculum to diversify and make more worldly.

So, this year, the planned curriculum was as follows: Fences, A Lesson Before Dying, In the Time of Butterflies, Romeo and Juliet, Persepolis. (Of course we have a bunch of short stories and poetry in there, too.)

We surveyed the students recently and discovered a lot had read Romeo and Juliet in middle school. There are also quite a bit who read A Lesson Before Dying. I have no problem with students reading books more than once, but there comes a point where it's not really fair. And so many of them try to fake it and just go by on memory, it becomes hard to teach around. (By the way, this is also a time where I share that it makes me pretty mad that so many middle schools teach these books. There are so many great young adult books that they have open for them yet they feel the need to teach books the students will be getting in high school. I don't know why and it's disappointing.)

As we finish up A Lesson Before Dying and move onto the next text, we're sort of wondering what sequence would work best. In re-reading In the Time of the Butterflies - which segues nicely in theme from ALBD - I'm also finding it pretty challenging, at least from the perspective of a 9th grader. It'll be a leap. But that's good, in a way. But is it too great of a leap?

I'm also wondering what to do with the Shakespeare unit. I love Romeo and Juliet, but so many students have been exposed to it already (some students described to me the same sort of film scene comparison activities that I planned on doing with them), that I'm thinking of going another way. Our school is putting on A Midsummer's Night Dream for the spring play, and I was considering that for a while. But I (a) don't like Midsummer very much; and (b) don't know it very well. I'm already teaching 9 new texts this year (8 in senior year and 1 - In the Time of the Butterflies - freshmen year), and don't know if I can add another one. I also considered Much Ado About Nothing, which I taught this year to the seniors and enjoyed. I think it's a fairly simple play that students will be able to understand. I don't really like that sort of misogyny with 9th graders (which is why I absolutely will not teach The Taming of the Shrew, which a couple of my colleagues are considering), but because the guys at least sort of get what's coming to them by the end (unlike in Taming), it could be do-able.

Another colleague is throwing the idea around of pairing Swimming in the Monsoon Sea with Othello. That could be interesting, though that might mean sacking Butterflies.

Decisions, decisions without time, time.

8 comments:

Jackie said...

We teach Macbeth with the 9th graders, and it works out REALLY well-- I would highly recommend it. There's certainly weighty themes like the corruption of power and living in an unjust society, etc, but there's also bloody scenes of murder and all the scenes with witches, which the kids enjoy!

Anonymous said...

I like Twelfth Night. You can watch the Trevor Nunn movie to see if you like it.

A BCPSS Parent said...

I found your comment about anger with MS teachers over teaching HS books interesting. I know I was surprised at the books my kids have read in MS. Some of them (like Romeo & Juliet) were HS books for me and many of them were books I read for pleasure. Are there certain books you think MS English departments should know are going to be covered in HS? Is there a way to get that information across to them (assuming they aren't reading this blog)? I've got to say that there have been some really good MS English teachers in my experience, and I don't think they are trying to mess with HS English departments. Since I have a MS child who's current English teacher seems pretty reasonable to me, I'd be happy to pass some information along. If you want me to and you want specifics email me at survivingthesystem.blog@gmail.com

Lisa said...

The overlap in novel choice is probably related to a lack of vertical teaming between the middle and high school. The Englsh Department at BCPSS should be coordinating so that this doesn't happen to you. I know it's tough for you because you get kids from all over the city...which is why there should be an aligned curriculum for you. I'm sorry there isn't. :(

Lisa said...

Oops, I mean the English department. Helps to preview your comment before hitting "send".

smoneil said...

I had the SAME problem with the middle school teachers. Over and over again, we told them to please avoid teaching HS texts, but they kept doing it anyways. The kids told us that their middle school teachers did it to "really prepare them" for HS.

As for your situation- Why not teach The Tempest? It would fit in quite well with your theme (Miranda comes of age in the text), and I taught it to 10th graders last year (they loved it). The Tempest was also one of the plays I used for my Folger curriculum project, so you should have some materials ready made from those files I passed along.

Epiphany said...

Jakie: I love Macbeth and have a soft spot for it because it was my first Shakespeare I studied (in the 10th grade). But it's an 11th grade stalwart at our school.

Anon: 12th Night is good. But I think Much Ado fits our course theme better.


A BCPSS Parent: "anger" might be a strong word - maybe frustration? The thing is, there's no real communication between high schools and middle schools, and, because we draw from all over the city, I don't know what we could do. I think it's neat that our city has so many interesting schools that have varying curriculum, and I'm generally anti-uniformity, and I think this is just a pill we have to swallow in order to have this individuality.

Lisa: Yeah, it can be a bummer.

Scott: The Tempest has been taught here in senior year, but I think it's a good idea, too!

April said...

if you're still looking to do a play-to-film comparison, what about either Othello or Hamlet? I have a soft spot for Michael Almereyda's version of Hamlet; I love the modern adaptation, and I can't get enough of Bill Murray's role as Polonious. Freaking. Awesome. Macbeth and King Lear are two of my other favorites. I don't know of any modern film adapations for either of those, but the films I saw were just as good.