Every now and then, we receive word that so-and-so will be in the building. It'll be someone from some place that matters. Someone who - if we don't look good - will get the bosses at the school in trouble.
Friday was one of those days. My department head came into class during first period, interrupting me, to tell me that so-and-so would be in the building at around one o'clock.
This is supposed to be a signal to me to get the interior decorating in line. Are the crappy photocopies of the core learning goals of the state somewhere to be found? Do I have classroom rules up? Am I stating my goals and indicators for the day?
Because in this system, good teaching isn't about connecting with the kids, or providing rigorous instruction. It's about the "look-for"'s - the things that someone who is above the teacher on the educational totem pole can see posted in his classroom or written on his chalkboard. If the "look-for"'s are up, then everyone can pat themselves on the back and congratulate themselves on doing a good job.
The key is to make your objectives as vague as possible, so you can spend the time actually concentrating on constructing the lessons - not what's on the chalkboard. Throw in the state standards for good measure, maybe even memorize a couple. Another key is to put the core goals up somewhere on the first day of the school year, so they're always there to point out if asked. Then, you are a great teacher.
This year, I decided to add my bit of civil protest to the visit. I posted a sign outside my door stating my class size of every class (average of 34, including all the way up to 37), and my class load (167 students). I worded it in a positive manner, and was not the first in my department to do it; it was sort of an unofficial protest by several members of the department. We are down 2-and-a-half English teachers from just two years ago, and class sizes have skyrocketed, and people should know.
Then, no one showed up. We often have false alarms about "visits," and it's amusing and disconcerting to see the higher-ups get flustered about it. Lots of learning is happening in my classroom (especially last week... what a week!), and, frankly, I'm not worried about someone visiting it. I actually like people in my classroom; I want them to see what we're doing. But no go this time.
Little Split Screen Action
-
In the view of Indiewire‘s Boyd Van Hoeij (how do you pronounce that?),
James Franco‘s As I Lay Dying is “just passable,” which raises the question
of whet...
1 hour ago

5 comments:
Thanks for the tip on "look-fors" ... we're having visitors on Wed., and I'll be sure to write some vague objectives! Brilliant. Now if only I could find my Code of Conduct ....
My guess is that the guest was to be the man who will be Hillary's running mate if she gets the nomination: Martin O'Malley, a.k.a. one of the field of Democratic candidates that will run in the next Presidential election should McCain somehow pull it out in this one.
That or maybe Zane was coming to bring some of Sheila Dixon's favorite literature to the classroom bay bee!!!!!!
No, the guest wasn't up the importance of O'Malley, and especially not Zane. :)
Also, I think Wesley Clark will be Clinton's VP if she gets the nomination. O'Malley, though, looks to be a figure in 2012, you're right - if McCain pulls it out. He's got a lot of work with education in this state to do before I'll ever support him again, though.
Fortunately not Zane :) I was seething when she made that Zane comment. Of all the black writers writing then, she had to pick Zane to make a point. ack!
You'd think O'Malley was going to be Hillary's running mate as much as he's campaigned for her. Or was that really him campaigning for himself, just a little early? :) Clark, with his military credentials would be a great running mate for Hillary. He's got charisma too, which certainly is coming into play with Obama's success. Plus, his military credentials might give him some traction in the South. I have a sense though, that the Democratic ticket might end up being Obama/Edwards, which would make me pleased as punch.
I just wish Bill Richardson had more appeal for a possible VP candidacy. Obviously, if he did have more appeal, he'd be in the Presidential race. But he's got a ton of experience with immigration, he's been in the cabinet, and he understands the need for alternative transport, working with the host railroads. Whichever candidate wins, they MUST bring him in for Energy or Transportation.
I agree, I like Richardson a lot. I wouldn't put it past him to be a VP for either of them; I think that's why he's holding out on endorsing either on.
I actually don't think we'll see Edwards on either ticket. I just don't think he adds enough to either ticket. Maybe... I basically like him, so I'd be fine iwth it.
I've been hoping for Obama/Clark for years, but Clark loves Hillary - he campaigns for her all the time, and it seems every day I have an email from him talking up Hillary - and I don't know if he'd agree to be with Obama. He's also been critical of Obama during the campaign. I think he's the best VP candidate there is, so he'd be a boon to either candidate, but H. Clinton is more likely.
I can see Obama matching up with Richardson or Bob Menendez (to help with the Latino vote), or even someone like Janet Napolitano. Joe Biden would be a great running mate as well if he wants a white guy to balance out the ticket. Kathleen Sebelius could emerge as a candidate. It'll definitely be interesting.
Post a Comment