Tuesday, September 13, 2005

Eleven things you can tell just by reading his blog

Late, late night last night. The concert was great, though. But with the hour I got in, I can't believe the morning went so well. I felt terrible for the first half hour, but after a while things felt fine and the lessons rocked today.

A few things:

1. I think I like John Roberts. And not just because of the baseball metaphor. I'm still a little concerned he could be a closet crazy conservative, but I think more likely that he's a moderate akin to O'Connor.

2. Strange, strange staff meeting today, complete with fireworks over what seems to be a forced minimum grade of 60 that we can give students. That is one order that there is no chance in hell I will follow.

3. I'm home tonight by 5:30, and have from now until bedtime to myself. This is the first time that I've had four or five consecutive hours to myself since last Wednesday, and I'm not exaggerating. There's a mountain of laundry to lug to the laundromat and wash, but more likely I'll have a nice evening at the gym (last workout was Friday), the grocery store for some badly needed groceries, the oil change place, and perhaps a little time behind the lawnmower. I've got tomorrow and the next day off at night, too.

4. Tomorrow my classes spend the day down in the library, getting instruction about the library resources. Not only is this the first time the library has been open with any sort of functionality in my five years of teaching, this is the first time a librarian has invited my classes and I in for a tutorial. I hope it means a day of me quietly sitting in the back, grading the already massive amounts of papers that I have to grade.

5. I'm now up to 161 students. Today, I heard a glimmer of sympathy from administration about it. That's the first glimmer I've heard from anyone in administration in my three years of having mammoth student loads that are double the student loads in other departments. I'm cautiously optimistic that something so dramatically unfair and against sound educational practices is finally being called out as being both those things.

6. Ernest Gaines, the author of A Lesson Before Dying (which my students read for summer reading and is one of my favorite books to teach), The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman, and A Gathering of Old Men, is coming to Towson University this month. I just found out yesterday - it's been poorly publicized, and I can't even get good info on the Towson website. But I'm determined to bring as many kids there as I can. I'm working on the busses as we speak (I'm on hold). I hope the kids get into it. I think I've got to make it a first come, first serve thing, where anyone who brings in the $6 for the busses will get to go. I hope they get into it. I'm personally very excited about seeing Gaines, who I think is one of our greatest living writers and will be someone whose work will be read in 200 years as one of the foremost American voices of the 20th century. I hope he's working on another novel because it's been fourteen years since A Lesson Before Dying.

7. If someone were to ask me the most important American writers of the 20th century, I'd say it's something like Gaines, Hemingway, Baldwin, Morrison, Steinbeck, Faulkner, and Vonnegut. I'm embarassed to say that I don't see more women on the list. Although I think women have written some of the greatest American novels of the 20th century (Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird, Zora Neale Hurston's Their Eyes Were Watching God, Louise Erdrich's Love Medicinei, Alice Walker's The Color Purple, Carson McCuller's The Heart is a Lonely Hunter, even Jumpha Lahiri's The Namesake [that one's early 21st century]), but many of those do not have as impressive bodies of work as those books suggest. I think this is interesting stuff, so if you have additions/contentions, let me know.

8. Speaking of great American writers of the 20th century, I was saddened to learn that August Wilson is dying of liver cancer. He announced just a couple weeks ago that doctors are giving him less than six months to live. I've taught his plays in each of the six years I've been in front of students - The Piano Lesson in Lansing, and Fences and Joe Turner's Come and Gone here - and once met him after a speech he gave at Michigan State. I saw his play Gem of the Ocean, starring Phylicia Rashad, last year on Broadway. He's a contentious old guy, but an incredible speaker, and his plays showcase his impressively poetic dialogue and well-drawn characters. The character of Troy Maxson, a former Negro league baseball star embittered about the prejudice that held him back from making a living playing the sport, so embittered that he refuses to allow his own teenage son to pursue a football scholarship because sports are a "white man's game," is one of my favorite characters in all of drama. The kids love August Wilson plays, as well. I'll be seeing his most recent play, Radio Golf, at Centre Stage this year, and he very well might have passed by then. Sad, and too young to die (60, and working on his first novel last I heard), but he's certainly been appreciated and honored in his lifetime and will be read and performed for years and years after his death.

9. My current instinct is that I don't see myself at this school next year. I think five years is a nice even number to go with. I like a lot of things that are happening there right now in terms of hallways being clear and strictness being applied, so it's not that. Rather, it's like I want to add a little chaos to my life that is my own doing, not the doing of someone else. Take control. I've been through four principals and three department heads in two years. My student load is very high. I'm definitely feeling overworked. All these things are not new but there gets a point where I need to bend a bit. Anyhow, I'm still not sure, at all, but that's my current instinct. Not to worry, I'm not going to be teaching anywhere but in an inner city somewhere, if I do decide to leave. And maybe we'll see how baseball season goes. Heh.

10. I've made 13 calls home this week. Kids are failing already, after having not done summer reading. Ugh. This is the year when I first start to hate summer reading. I think I have 75% of my kids' names down by now. Not bad after having only seen them five times each group.

11. In my continuing attempting to relate to my students, I decided to sprout a big red zit on the end of my nose this week. It no longer has a heartbeat of its own, but it still makes me feel a little like Rudolph the rednosed reindeer. Or like I'm 14. I decided to combat it by not shaving for five days.

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

Good list. Not sure I can argue with your picks. Although I personally am not a huge fan of Gaines or Steinbeck, I can respect them. Same with Hemingway - I have liked several of his books, but he didn't really grow much as a writer over his career, you know?

Are you talking poets? Then you could probably come up w/ a few more women - Plath, Moore, and Bishop come to mind.

As for fiction writers, I would put Flannery O'Connor at the top of any list and add Edith Wharton, Gertrude Stein, Thomas Pynchon, William Gaddis, Donald Barthelme, and F Scott. Maybe John Barth? I think you could make an argument for Eudora Welty, too. Maybe also Sherwood Anderson, but he is pretty much a one-book-wonder despite having written and published a lot. Henry Roth, too, although again - one book. Saul Bellow maybe?

Anonymous said...

Oh yeah, and I would put Dashell Hammettt on there - his stuff is amazing, and overlooked, IMO, because he was a genre writer. But nonetheless, he wrote powerful stuff, and noir is so important to American literature and film. Same with Raymond Chandler and James Cain. I would put Double Indemnity up against anything Hemingway wrote. I might lose, but I would still put it up :)

Tarot by Harish said...

William S. Burroughs for sure, but perhaps he's not suitable for kids. Kerouac? Pynchon gets my thumbs up as well. William "Neuromancer" Gibson is a personal fave. Why not Stephen King or, if you're looking for a lady, Anne Rice? Salinger. Somehwat obscure but great other personal fave: Jerzy "The Painted Bird" Kosinski.

Epiphany in Baltimore said...

First anon: I was thinking mostly novelists in this case. I had thought about O'Connor, whose short stories I love, but I've never read her (one?) novel. I had thought Wharton was British. I didn't think of Fitzgerald, probably because I'm one of those who hates "Gatsby," but, absolutely he'll be studied in 200 years. I like Welty a lot, but think she's better as a discussor of the writing craft rather than her own work, but she's certainly important (but only two novels, right?). I'm not sure about some of the others, but I'll check them out.

Tarot: Burroughs is an interesting choice, as is Kerouac. I've never read Pinchon and now I'm curious. I agree King will probably be read in a few hundred years, so that's a good suggestion. Salinger is one of my favorites (my dog's name is after one of his characters) but I don't think his body of work is wide enough to merit.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, if you limit to novelists, O'Connor's probably off the list -- I think her novel's ok, but she's definintely known for her short stories. Welty, too. I'd still stick to Pynchon, Gaddis, and F Scott, but I hear your argument. And a strong maybe for Barth. He was such an influence on so many writers, but hard to say whether he'll be read in 100 years.

I am not a personal fan of Burroughs or Kerouac, but I definitely can see their impact. The only thing of Burroughs I really liked was the Yage Letters, and those are letters.

Anonymous said...

Oh yeah, and Wharton is American. She just seems british.

langoki said...

in terms of body of work, I think you're not noting a great deal of Alice Walker's books, or Zora Neale Hurston's for that matter. I think Hemingway is a hack (feel free to argue, I've never been dissuaded from it) and I don't have the warm fuzzies for Kerouac or any of the other beats, who I mostly think are undisciplined and misogynistic. I think the great novel question is more interesting one... and I'd opt for "Confederacy of Dunces" on that list. He fails to make the novelist cut because he died in obscurity shortly after Dunces was published, and has only one other published work, "The Neon Bible." I consider them both must reads, as well as "Breakfast of Champions" and pretty much anything vonnegut that precedes the publication of "Bagombo Snuff Box." Tom Robbins doesn't get enough credit because he's funny and idealistic, but his earlier novels are taught and full of engaging ideas. "Fear of Flying would make my must-read list as well, every modern woman in America should read that book. "A heartbreaking work of staggering genius" is not a novel, but is still a must read. and almost none of the books I mentioned were for kids. sorry you missed the party. It was good.

Ms_Galadriel said...

Would you be able to explain something to me please? I'm also an English teacher, but I'm based in England (UK) and I'm really interested to understand how your teaching load compares to ours. For example, you mentioned that you have 161 students and that this is considered high. I teach approx 210 students and have a form group of another 30 (they register with me in the morning and afternoon - we are expected to 'teach' them in the morning registration period). I also teach across the English curriculum - so all types of writing and reading skils, as well as speaking and listening. My students come from all the year groups from 7-11 (which is age 11 to 16 - think the first five books of Harry Potter for the years!).

Would you be able to explain what having 'two preps' means? I teach each class a different text - does that mean I have 7 preps as I have 7 classes?

Just interested...

Thank you.

Anonymous said...

Man, Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius is WAY overrated... the first chapter of that book is great, but it goes downhill after that. Boo Eggers.

Epiphany in Baltimore said...

Ms. Galadriel: Well, a prep is a different course, not necessarily a different book. Your load sounds like that of a college professor, not a high school teacher. I'd definitely be interested in comparing more.

Langoki: Sorry I missed the party, too. I really wished I could have made it down, but the weekend of the Ukrainian Festival isn't one we can take off during.

As for Walker, maybe you're right. I just feel like she's too much like Nelly and not enough like Celie in much of her fiction. Didactic, in other words. As for Hurston, maybe, but he body of work is pretty small, and I'm not sure who on the list of nine you could jettison for her. I love Hemingway. Have you read "Farewell to Arms"?

I think I agree that the novel question is more interesting, especially since I'm so obsessed with the single novel author. The one-hit wonders - Lee, Salinger, Warren, and, yes, O'Toole.

Anonymous said...

Toni Morrison. Toni Morrison. Toni Morrison has GOT to be one of the most influential writers/ novelists, you name it, of the 20th century.

Anonymous said...

and so i see you had her on the list. Sorry.

Epiphany in Baltimore said...

I think that in 2000 years, when America may or may not be around, the five things that will be remembered from 20th Century American culture are Morrison, Steinbeck, the advent of jazz, hip-hop and moviemaking, baseball, and Aretha Franklin.

Something like that. I'd probably give different answers tomorrow. But I think Steinbeck and Morrison are the most influential/important/whatever American writers. I think some recordings of Ella Fitzgerald, Frank Sinatra, Ray Charles, and others will also stand the test of time.

I love talking about this stuff.

Susan said...

No additions of novelists at the moment. But if you get to thinking about memorable poets, definitely give some time to James Merrill.

Susan said...

Also, don't really want to change the topic from books to politics, but just noticed #1 on your posting again. I'm not really sure what I think about Roberts either, but lately I've been feeling pretty suspicious about his "closet conservative" tendencies, since learning that his wife Jane is a very passionate anti-abortion activist (former board member of "Feminists for Life"). Not that I think nominees should generally be evaluated by the choices of their spouses, but in this case it just seems pretty relevant to me. She also provided/provides legal counsel to the organization, in addition to continuing to donate money. Money that is more than likely jointly owned by John Roberts.

So, in this case, his wife's choices of how to spend her time and how to use their money is a pretty important detail to me in wondering whether he will truly make unbiased decisions. I just feel doubtful that he is ambivalent toward something his wife is so visibly passionate about. And, although he certainly is entitled to his own feelings on the subject, I just wonder whether he would be at all able to decide an abortion case without personal prejudice.

Anonymous said...

If you like one-hit wonders, you should definitely read Call it Sleep (Henry Roth) - amazing.