I know I should be into Harry Potter. I like what it's done to get kids reading, and think it's great that people go crazy and go to the premiere of a book.
But I read the first one a while ago, and I just found it okay. A little bit like warmed over Roald Dahl without the subversiveness. I mean, I didn't hate it, and maybe my expectations were too high, but I just thought it was okay. The movie was a rote retelling of it that didn't make me want to see the sequels and didn't leave much for those over twelve, even though I think I would like to see the Alfonso Cuaron-directed one someday because I've liked his work and that one got good reviews.
Anyhow, I feel a little guilty I'm not into this whole craze more. First off, it probably would be a good way to connect with my students, as I know a few of them will be fans. In fact, a student of mine from last year just e-mailed me all about it, saying, "... I don't want any other fantasy books except for Harry Potter. By the way, you haven't told me whether you read the HP Series or not!! You have to be!!" I heard from somebody that the books got better as they went on, that the longer the Harry Potter book, the better it is. We'll see. I've got a ton on my reading agenda right now, but maybe I'll be tempted.
Another good reason to be tempted is that my oldest friend, D., whose wedding I just attended in Maine, has been appointed the task of writing the review for the book from her employer, which just happens to be (one of the?) the largest news wire service in the country. Her review was due in to Gannett sometime this afternoon; apparently, she's been reading nonstop since she and John got the book at midnight on Friday. With any luck, it will be picked up and printed across the nation tomorrow and the next day. We'll see. That would make me read it, I think.
Right now, I'm still reading Don Quixote and finally picked up and read half of the Phil Jackson book Sacred Hoops, which is always on the summer reading table at Barnes and Noble, so I figure other schools are assigning it as summer reading. It actually might be a book to hand to kids because so far it's very readable and focuses on how Jackson meshes spirituality and basketball. Cool stuff, so far.
What The Hell Is Happening In Brazil? Ctd
-
A reader writes: I think the readers who wrote in about the protests in
Brazil are somewhat biased. These protests are not like Turkey’s: President
Dilma R...
21 minutes ago

4 comments:
I refused to read Harry Potter at first because I was so turned off by all the hype surrounding it. I found myself bored to tears babysitting one day and picked the first one off of my charge's bookshelf. I ended up reading the first three in about a week. I always loved to read when I was little, but my enjoyment of it lessened as I got older. Harry Potter was what it took to make me remember how much I liked reading (I know how cheesy that sounds, but it's true). Incidentally, the third one is my favorite; the sixth, which I read already because I just couldn't help myself, came in at number 2.
Oh, to be the second Lindsay writing here...
As the series grows, it becomes less childlike, and you see more of the author that JK Rowling is. While her writing is never subversive, she shows her roots as a Classics major by using timeless archtypes and struggles that are modernized without being (too) dumbed down. She is good for readers who are tired of modern Enid Blytons telling soppy stories that do not address the new generation of minds on a level they understand.
I am the same way. I read the first one, and it was enjoyable, but I couldn't get into the second one and gave up. I feel guilty--an English teacher and an avid reader, yet I don't like the series that everyone in the entire world loves? Weird.
Don't feel too bad...I've never read a Harry Potter book -- yet.
Post a Comment